Want to create or adapt books like this? Learn more about how Pressbooks supports open publishing practices.
148 Aggregate Expenditure: Investment, Government Spending, and Net Exports
Learning Objectives
Explain the investment, government spending, and net export functions
Explain how the aggregate expenditure curve is constructed from the consumption, investment, government spending and net export functions
You just read about the consumption function, but consumption is only one component of aggregate expenditure:
Aggregate Expenditure = C + I + G + (X – M).
Now let’s turn our attention to the other components in order to build a function for the total aggregate expenditures.
Aggregate Expenditure: Investment as a Function of National Income
Just as a consumption function shows the relationship between real GDP (or national income) and consumption levels, the investment function shows the relationship between real GDP and investment levels. When businesses make decisions about whether to build a new factory or to place an order for new computer equipment, their decision is forward-looking, based on expected rates of return, and the interest rate at which they can borrow for the investment expenditure. Investment decisions do not depend primarily on the level of GDP in the current year. Thus, the investment function can be drawn as a horizontal line, at a fixed level of expenditure. The slope of the investment function is zero, indicating no relationship between GDP and investment. Figure 1 shows an investment function where the level of investment is, for the sake of concreteness, set at the specific level of 500.
Figure 1. The Investment Function. The investment function is drawn as a horizontal line because investment is based on interest rates and expectations about the future, and so it does not change with the level of current national income. In this example, investment expenditures are at a level of 500. However, changes in factors like technological opportunities, expectations about near-term economic growth, and interest rates would all cause the investment function to shift up or down.
The appearance of the investment function as a horizontal line does not mean that the level of investment never changes. It means only that in the context of this two-dimensional diagram, the level of investment on the vertical aggregate expenditure axis does not vary with changes in the current level of GDP on the horizontal axis. However, all the other factors that influence investment—new technological opportunities, expectations about near-term economic growth, interest rates, the price of key inputs, and tax incentives for investment—can cause the horizontal investment function to shift up or down.
Aggregate Expenditure: Government Spending and Taxes as a Function of National Income
Federal, state and local governments determine the level of government spending through the budget process. In the Keynesian cross diagram, government spending appears as a horizontal line, as in Figure 2, where government spending is set at a level of 1,300 regardless of the level of GDP. As in the case of investment spending, this horizontal line does not mean that government spending is unchanging, only that it is independent of GDP.
Figure 2. The Government Spending Function. The level of government spending is determined by political factors, not by the level of real GDP in a given year. Thus, government spending is drawn as a horizontal line. In this example, government spending is at a level of 1,300. Congressional decisions to increase government spending will cause this horizontal line to shift up, while decisions to reduce spending would cause it to shift down.
The situation of taxes is different because taxes often rise or fall with the volume of economic activity. For example, income taxes are based on the level of income earned and sales taxes are based on the amount of sales made, and both income and sales tend to be higher when the economy is growing and lower when the economy is in a recession. For the purposes of constructing the basic Keynesian cross diagram, it is helpful to view taxes as an average percentage of income. In the United States, for example, taking federal, state, and local taxes together, government typically collects about 30–35% of national income as taxes.
Table 2 revises the earlier table on the consumption function so that it takes taxes into account. The first column shows national income. The second column calculates taxes, which in this example are set at a rate of 30%, or 0.3. The third column shows after-tax income; that is, total income minus taxes. The fourth column then calculates consumption in the same manner as before: multiply after-tax income by 0.8, representing the marginal propensity to consume, and then add $600, for the amount that would be consumed even if income was zero. When taxes are included, the marginal propensity to consume is reduced by the amount of the tax rate, so each additional dollar of income results in a smaller increase in consumption than before taxes. For this reason, the consumption function, with taxes included, is flatter than the consumption function without taxes, as Figure 3 shows.
Figure 3. The Consumption Function Before and After Taxes. The upper line repeats the consumption function from previously. The lower line shows the consumption function if taxes must first be paid on income, and then consumption is based on after-tax income.
Table 2. The Consumption Function Before and After Taxes
Income
Taxes
After-Tax Income
Consumption
Savings
$0
$0
$0
$600
–$600
$1,000
$300
$700
$1,160
–$460
$2,000
$600
$1,400
$1,720
–$320
$3,000
$900
$2,100
$2,280
–$180
$4,000
$1,200
$2,800
$2,840
–$40
$5,000
$1,500
$3,500
$3,400
$100
$6,000
$1,800
$4,200
$3,960
$240
$7,000
$2,100
$4,900
$4,520
$380
$8,000
$2,400
$5,600
$5,080
$520
$9,000
$2,700
$6,300
$5,640
$660
Try It
Aggregate Expenditure: Export and Imports as a Function of National Income
The export function, which shows how exports change with the level of a country’s own real GDP, is drawn as a horizontal line, as in the example in Figure 4(a) where exports are drawn at a level of $840. Again, as in the case of investment spending and government spending, drawing the export function as horizontal does not imply that exports never change. It just means that they do not change because of what is on the horizontal axis—that is, a country’s own level of domestic production—and instead are shaped by the level of aggregate demand in other countries. More demand for exports from other countries would cause the export function to shift up; less demand for exports from other countries would cause it to shift down.
Figure 4. The Export and Import Functions. (a) The export function is drawn as a horizontal line because exports are determined by the buying power of other countries and thus do not change with the size of the domestic economy. In this example, exports are set at 840. However, exports can shift up or down, depending on buying patterns in other countries. (b)The import function is drawn in negative territory because expenditures on imported products are a subtraction from expenditures in the domestic economy. In this example, the marginal propensity to import is 0.1, so imports are calculated by multiplying the level of income by –0.1.
Imports are drawn in the Keynesian cross diagram as a downward-sloping line. The slope is given by the marginal propensity to import (MPI), which is the percentage change in spending on imports when national income changes. The slope is negative because since aggregate expenditure measures spending on domestic goods and services, spending on imports takes away from aggregate expenditure; thus, the MPI is negative.
In Figure 4(b), the marginal propensity to import is 0.1. Thus, if real GDP is $5,000, imports are $500; if real GDP is $6,000, imports are $600, and so on. The import function is drawn as downward sloping and negative, because it represents a subtraction from the aggregate expenditures in the domestic economy. A change in the marginal propensity to import, perhaps as a result of changes in preferences, would alter the slope of the import function.
Putting It Together: The Aggregate Expenditure Function
The final step in the deriving the aggregate expenditure function, which shows the total expenditures in the economy for each level of real GDP, is to sum the parts, which is shown in Table 3.
Table 3. The Aggregate Expenditure Function
Income
Consumption
Investment
Government Spending
Net Exports
Aggregate Expenditure
$0
$600
$500
$1,300
$840
$3,240
$1,000
$1,160
$500
$1,300
$740
$3,700
$2,000
$1,720
$500
$1,300
$640
$4,160
$3,000
$2,280
$500
$1,300
$540
$4,620
$4,000
$2,840
$500
$1,300
$440
$5,080
$5,000
$3,400
$500
$1,300
$340
$5,540
$6,000
$3,960
$500
$1,300
$240
$6,000
$7,000
$4,520
$500
$1,300
$140
$6,460
$8,000
$5,080
$500
$1,300
$40
$6,920
$9,000
$5,640
$500
$1,300
-$ 60
$7,380
Each of the columns in Table 3 comes from the previous tables and figures. For example the second column, consumption, comes from Table 2, and the fifth column, net exports, is computed from the numbers in Figure 4. Taking national income (or Real GDP) from column 1 and aggregate expenditure from column 6, we can graph the aggregate expenditure function.
Graphically, the aggregate expenditure function is formed by adding together (or stacking on top of each other) the consumption function (after taxes), the investment function, the government spending function, and the net export function. In its most basic form, the graph of aggregate expenditures looks like the graph shown in Figure 5.
Figure 5. Graphing Aggregate Expenditure. The aggregate expenditure is the vertical sum of C + I + G + (X-M).The actual graph for the aggregate expenditure data in Table 3 is slightly more complicated, due to the effect of imports, as shown in Figure 6. Let’s think carefully about how this works. Investment spending and government spending are fixed amounts; thus, adding the investment and government spending functions shifts the aggregate expenditure line up, parallel to the consumption function. Export expenditures are also a fixed amount, but import expenditures are not. Imports are a negative function of national income, so the net export function is downward sloping with a slope equal to the marginal propensity to import. As a result, when we add net exports to aggregate expenditure, the AE curve becomes flatter, which you can see in the figure. Figure 6.The Aggregate Expenditure Curve. The aggregate expenditure is the vertical sum of C + I + G + (X-M). Adding I,G and X shifts the function upward. Adding M flattens the curve.In sum, the vertical intercept of the aggregate expenditure function, that is, the point at which the aggregate expenditure function intersects the vertical axis is autonomous expenditure, i.e. all the components of aggregate expenditure (e.g. autonomous consumption, investment, government, and export expenditures)—which do not vary with national income. The upward slope of the aggregate expenditure function will be determined by the marginal propensity to consume, the tax rate, and the marginal propensity to import. A lower marginal propensity to consume, a higher tax rate, and a higher marginal propensity to import will all make the slope of the aggregate expenditure function flatter—because out of any extra income, more is going to savings or taxes or imports and less to spending on domestic goods and services.
Try It
Try It
These questions allow you to get as much practice as you need, as you can click the link at the top of the first question (“Try another version of these questions”) to get a new set of questions. Practice until you feel comfortable doing the questions.
graphical relationship between national income as a function of aggregate expenditure, which is defined as consumption plus investment plus government spending plus net exports
Aggregate Expenditure Schedule:
aggregate expenditure function expressed as a table
Autonomous Expenditures:
all the components of aggregate expenditure, which do not vary with national income; these include autonomous consumption, investment, government, and export expenditures
Consumption Function:
graphical relationship between national income and consumption expenditure; algebraically: C = a + MPC*Y, where a is autonomous consumption (the amount of consumption expenditure when Y = 0), MPC is the marginal propensity to consume, and Y is national income
Government Spending Function:
horizontal line showing the relationship between national income and government spending
Investment Expenditure Function:
horizontal line showing the relationship between national income and investment expenditure
Marginal Propensity to Consume:
fraction of any change in income which is spent; algebraically MPC =ΔC /ΔY
Marginal Propensity to Import:
fraction of any change in income which is spent; algebraically MPI =ΔM /ΔY
Marginal Propensity to Save:
fraction of any change in income which is saved; algebraically MPS = ΔS /ΔY
Net Export Function:
graphical relationship between national income and net exports (export expenditures minus import expenditures)
